Re: amd64 as default architecture

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: amd64 as default architecture
From: Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 20:33:24 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] E1SWBsa-0004ak-11@mail.einval.com>
In-reply-to: <m2n.s.2012052015422025810@mossbank.org.uk>
References: <[🔎] 1337480175.4107.271.camel@deadeye> <[🔎] 87mx53i4mv.fsf@frosties.localnet> <[🔎] 1337518821.4107.339.camel@deadeye> <[🔎] 1337518821.4107.339.camel@deadeye>

Marco wrote:
>On May 20, Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
>
>> No, keep i386 userland only.  Though we might consider reducing even
>> that to a 'partial architecture' that has only libraries (similar to
>> ia32-libs today, only cleaner).
>Don't you believe in x32?

Puke. Please, no. If it had happened back when amd64 was starting up,
it might have looked useful. Now it's a joke and a waste of time.

-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.                                steve@einval.com
"You can't barbecue lettuce!" -- Ellie Crane

Reply to:

References:
- amd64 as default architecture
  - From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
- Re: amd64 as default architecture
  - From: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>
- Re: amd64 as default architecture
  - From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: amd64 as default architecture
Next by Date: Re: amd64 as default architecture
Previous by thread: Re: amd64 as default architecture
Next by thread: Re: amd64 as default architecture
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread