[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#481129: Bug#671503: general: APT repository format is not documented

On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 06:45:00PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> +++ Julian Andres Klode [2012-05-18 13:38 +0200]:
> > We currently have three independent implementations of the repository
> > format in the archive: APT, cupt, smartpm. 
> I think reprepro is another?

Of course, I was just only talking about clients. When it comes to
creating we probably have much more than 3 programs needing some
knowledge of the repository format. We have dak, apt-ftparchive,
reprepro, debian-cd, everyone's small script, mini-dinstall (the
latter using flat repositories, if I am not mistaken).
Julian Andres Klode  - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member

See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/.

Attachment: pgpdYEHpdny6k.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: