Re: RFC: OpenRC as Init System for Debian
Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Uoti Urpala wrote:
> >Who's the one choosing his preferred configuration format based on the
> >limitations of his preferred packaging system here? Hint: it's not Red
> >Hat.
>
> *yawn*
>
> When you've got something constructive to add to Debian development,
> let us know. Until that point, please go away and stop trolling.
I have given technical reasons to prefer etc-overrides-lib semantics.
You failed to address any of the reasons I or others have given. Instead
you started by bashing Red Hat, and then gave as your only reason to
prefer traditional conffile semantics the same motivation you had just
alleged Red Hat of having and had bashed them for. If you post
fallacious nonsense, there usually isn't much more to say to that except
point out that it IS fallacious nonsense.
If you want to have a constructive discussion, then try to explain what
you think is wrong with the arguments for etc-overrides-libs, or what
technical advantages you think the traditional conffile model has which
would be more important.
Reply to: