Re: Fwd: Re: Bug#614907: nodejs/node command conflict: why can't we have both?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Bug#614907: nodejs/node command conflict: why can't we have both?
From: Bernd Zeimetz <bernd@bzed.de>
Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 18:33:34 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 4FA6A7DE.5090909@bzed.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20120503223819.GP17599@furrball.stateful.de>
References: <[🔎] 20120503223819.GP17599@furrball.stateful.de>

On 05/04/2012 12:38 AM, Carsten Hey wrote:
> Should not at least @debian.org addresses by default be whitelisted on
> the tech-ctte list?

I don't think so - the BTS is usefull to ensure that all discussion to a bug is
collected at one place and not spread between the bug and the mailinglist.

-- 
 Bernd Zeimetz                            Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 http://bzed.de                                http://www.debian.org
 GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485  DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F

Reply to:

References:
- Fwd: Re: Bug#614907: nodejs/node command conflict: why can't we have both?
  - From: Carsten Hey <carsten@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#671744: ITP: rutorrent -- a web front-end for the rtorrent client
Next by Date: Re: Circular Build Dependencies
Previous by thread: Re: Fwd: Re: Bug#614907: nodejs/node command conflict: why can't we have both?
Next by thread: Work-needing packages report for May 4, 2012
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread