Re: smaller than 0 but not negative (Re: question about "Conflicts:"
On 05/04/12 00:14, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Patrick Lauer
>
>> Not this decade - we're ahead of the pack, as usual ;)
> So you don't support for instance 1.0~git20120503, then? (the git
> snapshot from today of what will become 1.0)
>
What a weird idea.
1.0_pre20120503 maybe, but why package a snapshot like that when you can
just have a "live" packages that checks out and builds from git directly
... (and have that updated whenever it tickles your fancy)
Reply to: