On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:48:12AM +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 14:31 +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 09:25:17AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > > > Ubuntu's version of debhelper includes changes to maintainer scripts to > > > avoid calling update-rc.d for sysvinit scripts when there is a > > > corresponding Upstart job, from which I infer that Upstart does not do > > > the same as systemd? If that's the case, then that's why Upstart needs > > > special and careful handling in Policy. It also makes Ubuntu's debhelper > > > patches unsuitable for use in Debian in their current form, since the > > > patch effectively assumes that if there is an Upstart job, it will be > > > run, and that's not true on non-Upstart systems. > > dh_installinit(1) in unstable already prefers debian/package.upstart to > > debian/package.init and doesn't install both when both are present. > How would that work on non-linux systems, service not started? Or should > every non-linux system support their own package.init file? What about > if systemd is preferred for a linux user? Huh? -- WBR, wRAR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature