[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Switching /etc/mtab to /proc/mounts and removing /lib/init/rw



On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 01:19:00PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> The "problem" is that kernel does not know what /dev/mapper
> is, or what does /dev/r/usr thing mean.  It knows these by
> their canonical (and meaningless) dm-N names, like this:
> 
> [    6.887981] EXT4-fs (dm-0): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
> [    6.917555] EXT4-fs (dm-1): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: usrquota
> 
> Go figure which is dm-0 and which is dm-1 (lvm is here)!
> 
> My point is that actually, _both_ /dev/mapper/r-usr and
> /dev/r/usr are wrong!  But at least they - hopefully -
> lead to the actual device, unlike kernel messages I
> mentioned above which leads to nothing due to /dev/dm-0
> non-existing.

At least on my system (udev), they certainly do exist, for example:

% ls -l /dev/mapper/ravenclaw-root
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 Jan 20 09:01 /dev/mapper/ravenclaw-root -> ../dm-0
% ls -l /dev/ravenclaw/root 
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 Jan 20 09:01 /dev/ravenclaw/root -> ../dm-0
% ls -l /dev/dm-0 
brw-rw---T 1 root disk 253, 0 Jan 20 09:01 /dev/dm-0

So the dm-n devices all do exist, and one can work out which
logical volume each represent by looking at the symlinks.


Regards,
Roger

-- 
  .''`.  Roger Leigh
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux             http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
 `. `'   Printing on GNU/Linux?       http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
   `-    GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848   Please GPG sign your mail.


Reply to: