Re: [Long] UEFI support
On Mon, 9 Jan 2012, Paul Wise <email@example.com> wrote:
> > Aside from that, there is still the issue of 32bit binary-only software.
> I would imagine that is irrelevant to this thread since you aren't
> talking about bootloaders.
You can run a 32bit application in a chroot or in a DomU under a 64bit
But the option of having a full 32bit environment is also useful. Admittedly
it's becomming less useful as RAM >4G is becomming more common which allows
more application address space if the kernel is 64bit.
My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/
My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/