Re: Bug#644788: Bug#654116: RFH: screen -- terminal multiplexor with VT100/ANSI terminal emulation

[Matthew Woodcraft <matthew@woodcraft.me.uk>]

Axel Beckert  <abe@debian.org> wrote:

>Simon McVittie wrote:
>> Would it be enough for the "your old screen binary is
>> /tmp/screen-yhpoe8r/screen" notice to also say "if your /tmp is mounted
>> noexec, you might need to copy it elsewhere to run it"?

> That's my current plan -- with the noexec notice just being displayed
> if /tmp actually is mounted noexec.

Will you need something similar if /tmp is mounted nosuid? I think
that's more common.

-M-