[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#644788: Bug#654116: RFH: screen -- terminal multiplexor with VT100/ANSI terminal emulation

On Jan 03, Edward Allcutt <edward@allcutt.me.uk> wrote:

> On Tue, 3 Jan 2012, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> >It does not matter, this is needed strictly for the time of the upgrade
> >process.
> Just how short do you expect this to be? I'm sure many of us
> dist-upgrade daily and (shock! horror!) don't reboot after each
> upgrade.
This is only relevant for stable to stable upgrades, if you use testing 
or unstable then you are supposed to be able to cope with such things.

> We also don't expect existing processes to break or become
> inaccessible after an upgrade.
This is why you will get a debconf notice which will inform you about
the needed workaround if you want to continue the upgrade and do not 
reboot soon after it.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: