Re: Bug#652275: Guided partitioning should not offer separate /usr, /var, and /tmp partitions; leave that to manual partitioning
Roger Leigh <rleigh@codelibre.net> wrote:
>To be honest, I've always found apt's inability to manage its
>cache without manual intervention somewhat annoying. It should
>be perfectly capable of pruning its own cache rather than
>pointlessly filling up /var with thousands of downloaded
>packages. I'm surprised it doesn't automatically remove
>outdated .debs when you update, and require special configuration
>not to do that.
>
I rather see it as conservative. Nowadays, a few extra hundreds of megabytes are not critical, or at least should not be. But imagine you update a package and it breaks your system - You have the older .deb cached right away. I know you could get it off another computer if you're having network problems, but I think the predefined caching has its advantages too.
Daniel
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Bug#652275: Guided partitioning should not offer separate /usr, /var, and /tmp partitions; leave that to manual partitioning
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
- Re: Bug#652275: Guided partitioning should not offer separate /usr, /var, and /tmp partitions; leave that to manual partitioning
- From: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>
- Re: Bug#652275: Guided partitioning should not offer separate /usr, /var, and /tmp partitions; leave that to manual partitioning
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
- Re: Bug#652275: Guided partitioning should not offer separate /usr, /var, and /tmp partitions; leave that to manual partitioning
- From: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>
- Re: Bug#652275: Guided partitioning should not offer separate /usr, /var, and /tmp partitions; leave that to manual partitioning
- From: Roger Leigh <rleigh@codelibre.net>