[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Fwd: Re: Open-FCoE for Wheezy



There is an effort to develop a software target along with the open-FCoE
stack. This would help reduce some of the cost by removing the need for
target and possible a switch. (back to back configuration: FCoE
initiator to software target) You would still need a 10Gb adapter on
both ends.

There is already some support for this in opensuse, fedora and ubuntu.


Thanks,

On 12/10/2011 03:59 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Including debian-devel..
> 
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: 	Re: Open-FCoE for Wheezy
> Date: 	Fri, 09 Dec 2011 18:31:01 +0530
> From: 	Ritesh Raj Sarraf <rrs@debian.org>
> Reply-To: 	rrs@debian.org
> Organization: 	RESEARCHUT
> To: 	debian-release@lists.debian.org
> 
> 
> 
> Any suggestions?
> 
> It is a new and expensive technology and hasn't seen much adoption yet.
> 
> 
> On 12/02/2011 01:14 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
>> Hello Release Team,
>>
>> Please provide me some Release readiness assistance for Open-FCoE's
>> inclusion for Wheezy/Sid
>>
>> Open-FCoE [1], is a newer SAN technology to carry Fiber Channel traffic
>> over Ethernet. The ethernet is generalized in the definition but in
>> reality, a newer 10 GiB DCB Ethernet card is required for FCoE
>> capabilities. Also to mention the refreshes required on the switch
>> infrastructure.
>>
>> My initial hope was to get some access to FCoE hardware setup that I
>> could spare for Debian. Unfortunately, for multiple reasons that didn't
>> happen and I don't see having access to the hardware any time soon.
>>
>> Open-FCoE stack is currently in experimental. I have had no [bug]
>> reports yet. Also the popcon stats is very low.
>>
>>
>> The assistance I'm seeking from you is about its release readiness for
>> Wheezy/Sid. Should I get these packages uploaded to Wheezy/Sid? There
>> might not be many packaging errors, but with no real user testing in a
>> production environment, I have no idea how the stack will behave.
>>
>>
>> Should I go ahead with the inclusion of Open-FCoE into the Debian archive?
>>
>>
>> [1] http://www.open-fcoe.org
>>
> 
> 
> -- 
> Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
> Debian - The Universal Operating System
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Jack Morgan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: