Hello Sune, Sune Vuorela a écrit : > On Friday 16 September 2011 14:33:49 Georges Khaznadar wrote: > > * Package name : qt-solutions2009-gpl > > You are aware that qt solutions is dead upstream, and this is a 2 years old > copy of it? Yes I am aware of it. The reason why I try to push this zombie code into Debian is that it is currently used within the software Sankore, which is under active development. This software provides the first good open-source solution for using interactive whitebords in educational environments. See http://sankore.org/ An alternative would be to merge the relevant code into Sankore's main source, and tagging this obsoleted code as a candidate to be replaced as soon as possible. Is that solution better? > > Version : 1.0 > > Where does this version number come from? This version number is arbitrary. 2009.0 would be more appropriate? > > Upstream Author : Nokia Corporation and/or its subsidiary(-ies) > > * URL : > > ftp://ftp.heanet.ie/mirrors/ftp.trolltech.com/pub/qt/solutions/lgpl/*.tar. > > gz * License : GPL-3 > > Is there any reason why you haven't instead chosen the BSD licensed newer > editions from qt.gitorious.org? Or at least listed the alternative lgplv2.1 > license that it is also offered under? Unfortunately some subpackages which are necessary in Sankore are no more found in qt.gitorious.org, for example: qtsingleapplication. Maybe I did not search at the good place in qt.gitorious.org? > > qt-solutions2009-gpl provides a set of code bundles, documentation, > > buildable examples to fulfill many subsidiary needs. The file > > README.Debian gives details about the fields which are covered. For > > example: > > Some of teh projects have already been merged in released editions of Qt and > thus actually quite useless to be shipped here. PLease can you point me to a web page which gives a reliable list of those projects? It would obviously make my package of zombies lighter. > ANd beside all this, I'm questioning the general usefulness of providing this > code as is. > > Some of teh bits could be useful if they are actually properly packaged and > maintained as libraries, but that's not what the package in NEW seems to be > providing. If there is some mean to reduce the size of qt-solutions2009-gpl, it would be a useful build-dependency for the future package sankore. If not, what would you suggest? Best regards, Georges.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature