]] Juliusz Chroboczek
Hi,
| I stand corrected, it's actually part of the configuration (symlink from
| runlevel5.target to multi-user.target). Tollef, should the Debian
| package change that?
: tfheen@qurzaw /lib/systemd/system > ls -l runlevel?.target
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 2011-07-07 13:37 runlevel0.target -> poweroff.target
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 2011-07-07 13:37 runlevel1.target -> rescue.target
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 2011-07-07 13:37 runlevel2.target -> multi-user.target
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 2011-07-07 13:37 runlevel3.target -> multi-user.target
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 2011-07-07 13:37 runlevel4.target -> multi-user.target
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 2011-07-07 13:37 runlevel5.target -> multi-user.target
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 2011-07-07 13:37 runlevel6.target -> reboot.target
: tfheen@qurzaw /lib/systemd/system >
This looks quite correct to me? (It's also what's shipped in the package.)
| > TTBOMK, cgroups are not optional.
|
| From cgroup.c, line 270:
|
| if (path_is_mount_point("/sys/fs/cgroup/systemd") <= 0) {
| log_warning("No control group support available, not creating root group.");
| return 0;
| }
hmm, ok. I suspect it will work much less well without cgroup support
even so, and in general upstream's not interested in supporting
non-linux even if you could make it limp along.
Cheers,
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are