[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: network-manager as default? No! (was: Bits from the Release Team - Kicking off Wheezy)



On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 10:51:08PM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 06 April 2011, 19:05:11 schrieb Stanislav Maslovski:
> > > On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 07:29:05AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > > Then you can stack all soft of stuff on top of it, and get them to
> > > > work manually for your specific setup, and since it’s not event-based
> > 
> >                                                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > 
> > > > you have to hard-code the way your network is set up.
> > 
> >                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > The underlined claims, btw, are also false.
> 
> You made clear that you think of yourself as the ultimate master of ifupdown. 
> So what? That tells us _nothing_ about the rest of the world...

First of all, that is only your interpretation which is wrong. Second,
there is no point in turning a discussion about ifupdown vs. NM into a
discussion of my abilities/disabilities.

-- 
Stanislav


Reply to: