Hello, On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 11:56:15 +0100 Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote: > > Does this imply that "fixing" ifupdown to query the state(s) via > > netlink instead of relying on state files would solve most of the > > problems? > I expect so, but it would be a very big 'fix'. Well, ifupdown will still need state files, because they are used to store the certain configuration chosen for the given interface during ifup. Another thing is that they may be ignored when the interface isn't really 'up', as per kernel. What do you think? -- WBR, Andrew
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature