Am Mittwoch, den 09.03.2011, 22:28 +0000 schrieb Ian Jackson:
> Benjamin Drung writes ("Re: new scripts and patches for devscripts"):
> > Am Mittwoch, den 09.03.2011, 16:42 +0000 schrieb Ian Jackson:
> > > > add-patch
> > > > check-symbols
> > > > cowbuilder-dist
> > > > debian-distro-info
> > > > distro-info
> > > > edit-patch
> > > > get-build-deps
> > > > merge-changelog
> > > > mk-sbuild
> > > > pbuilder-dist
> > > > pull-debian-source (?)
> > > > reverse-build-depends
> > > > suspicious-source
> > > > what-patch
> > > > wrap-and-sort
> > >
> > > Almost all of these are very poorly named.
> >
> > Better name suggestions are welcome.
>
> udt-* for all applicable *, where "udt" stands for "ubuntu-dev-tools".
Why? These scripts are not ubuntu specific. Would you rename all scripts
in devscripts for "dv-*", where "dv" stands for devscripts?
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part