[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#612358: ITP: lpg-generator-java -- Java Runtime support for the LPG parser



Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

* Package name    : lpg-generator-java
  Version         : 2.0.20
  Upstream Author : Philippe Charles <pgcharles@users.sourceforge.net>
* URL             : http://lpg.sourceforge.net/
* License         : EPL-1.0
  Programming Lang: Java
  Description     : Java Runtime support for the LPG parser

The LALR parser generator (LPG) is a tool for developing scanners and parsers
written in Java, C++ or C. Input is specified by BNF rules. LPG supports
backtracking (to resolve ambiguity), automatic AST generation and grammar
inheritance.


Rationale for packaging this: eclipse-cdt appears to have modules depending on
this, which are currently disabled.
  If it turns out that I also need the lpg-generator (written in C/C++), I will
probably put both parts into the same source package.

Note: On the upstream author I chose Philippe, because SF lists Philippe as
project manager and there did not appear to be a team mailing list.

~Niels


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
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=QM5H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: