[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: iw: priority should be "optional"



Hi

On Friday 30 December 2011, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 16:56 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > > Package: iw
> > > Version: 0.9.19-1
> > > Severity: important
> > > Justification: policy §2.5
> > > 
> > > aircrack-ng depends on iw, but the former is optional and the latter of
> > > priority "extra".  Please bump up the priority of iw to optional to
> > > match.
[...]
> The description of the crda package doesn't really make it obvious why
> users might want it.  To enable wifi frequencies that some locales don't
> permit, such as channels 12-14?  That seems worthy of a Recommends at
> most, and quite possibly just a Suggests.

Channel 12-14 in the 2.4 GHz and most (basically all) of 5 GHz, due to 
only small overlaps between FCC (US), ETSI (EU) and JP (Japan) and 
DFS[1] requirements; DFS support in mainline is still a work in 
(active) progress. An overview for the regulatory subsystem of the 
linux kernel (there is active cooperation with FreeBSD particularly in 
regards to DFS) is available under [2].

crda/ iw and wireless-regdb are basically required to apply the 
regulatory settings for modern wlan cards, both acting about regulatory
hints stored in the card's EEPROM/ OTP or, as intersection, received
through IEEE 802.11d from the access point and/ or based upon the local
configuration[3].

Regards
	Stefan Lippers-Hollmann

[1]	http://wireless.kernel.org/en/developers/DFS
[2]	http://wireless.kernel.org/en/developers/Regulatory/
[3]	/etc/default/crda
	http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=kernel/crda.git;a=blob;f=debian/crda.default

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: