[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: bug#10363: /etc/mtab -> /proc/mounts symlink affects df(1) output for

jidanni@jidanni.org writes:
>   Filesystem                                             1K-blocks    Used Available Use% Mounted on
>   rootfs                                                   1071468  287940    729100  29% /
>   /dev/disk/by-uuid/551e44e1-2cad-42cf-a716-f2e6caf9dc78   1071468  287940    729100  29% /

(I'm replying only on the issue of the duplicate mount point. Someone else
can tackle the long ugly name.)

The one with "rootfs" as its device is the initramfs which you automatically
get with all recent kernels. Even if you aren't using an initramfs, there's
an empty one built into the kernel which gets mounted as the first root
filesystem. The real root gets mounted on top of that.

So this is a special case of a general problem with no easy solution: What
should df do when 2 filesystems are mounted at the same location? It can't
easily give correct information for both of them, since the later mount
obscures the earlier mount from view.

If there's a way for df to get the correct information for the lower mount, I
don't know what it would be. If you have a process with a leftover cwd or
open fd in the obscured filesystem, you can use that. But generally you

But maybe we could do better than reporting incorrectly that the lower mount
has size and usage identical to the upper mount! At least df could print a
warning at the end if it has seen any duplicate entries. Perhaps there is
some way it could figure out which one is on top, and print a bunch of
question marks as the lower mount's statistics.

If df is running as root, it might be able to unshare(2) the mount namespace,
unmount the upper level, and then statfs the mount point again to get the
correct results for the lower level. That won't work in all cases (even in a
private namespace you can't unmount the filesystem containing your own cwd)
and it does nothing for you if you're not root, but still... it would be a
cool bonus in the cases where it does work.

As a special case, "rootfs" should probably be excluded from the default
listing, since the initramfs is not very interesting most of the time. It
could still be shown with the -a option, although it would always have the
wrong statistics. Or if you really want to be impressive, default to showing
the initramfs if and only if it is the only thing mounted on "/" - so you can
run df within the initramfs before the real root is mounted and get the right

Or... (brace yourself for the most bold idea yet)... can you imagine a kernel
interface that would *cleanly* give access to obscured mount points?

Comments on any of the above? Do the BSDs have any bright ideas we can steal,
or is their df as embarrassingly bad at handling obscured mount points as

Alan Curry

Reply to: