Le samedi 17 décembre 2011 à 17:42 +0800, Thomas Goirand a écrit : > I do recommend a separate /usr to anyone. It's *not* safe to say that, > and I know many people that agree with me. To me, it has, and still is, > the best choice. You have no rights to arbitrary decide what should > be/was/will be the recommended configuration. Your choice is not more > valid than mine, and (computer) science isn't about majorities anyway. True. But the fact that you are in minority doesn’t necessarily mean you are right, either. > Doing this has many advantage. Like, if your laptop has to unexpectedly > reboot (like when you inadvertently removed power cord when batteries > were not plugged, which happens often in real life), having separated > partitions usually makes the fsck faster. This is complete bullshit. With a journaled filesystem, the boot time will greatly increase with the number of filesystems to check. If no files were modified in /usr, they won’t be mentioned in the journal, and that’s all. But having one journal to parse for all the system is definitely a measurable improvement. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' `-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part