On Sun, 2011-11-20 at 21:29 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 07:36:43PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > So far as I'm aware, none of the above will be generated directly by > > compilers (though they may be available through 'intrinsics'). So it > > may be that there is little to be gained by moving to 586-class as a > > minimum. If that is so, we should instead think forward to 686-class > > with CMOV as a minimum for wheezy + 1. Use of CMOV instructions is an > > important optimisation and they *are* generated directly by compilers. > > And I think gcc already generates cmov instructions. Not by default on i386. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Usenet is essentially a HUGE group of people passing notes in class. - Rachel Kadel, `A Quick Guide to Newsgroup Etiquette'
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part