Re: Minified files and source code requirement
Pau Garcia i Quiles, 2011-10-27 11:22:08 +0200 :
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Roland Mas <email@example.com> wrote:
>>> Requiring the non-minified file to be provided in the same source
>>> package is not a very productive use of our time.
>> Right. In the same way that providing the source for our binaries
>> isn't very productive, I guess, because who's going to use it when they
>> have the pre-built binaries? I know this is an exaggeration, but
>> there's no substantial difference between the two cases.
> But we provide *source packages*. We do not provide the source in the
> *binary* package.
> That's what Raphael is talking about: having the minified and the
> be the binary package, and also the source package).
I don't think anyone is actually arguing in favour of shipping the
original JS in the binary packages. The point being argued is whether
shipping *only* the minified JS in the source package is correct or
> I said this in the original thread and I'll repeat it here: if we have
> the minified version in the binary package.
Agreed, if the minified version is actually generated during the
package build. If it's not, then we get back to the initial problem.
> To me, these are equivalents:
> And that's not entirely true, btw, because it depends on what minifier
> has been applied. IIRC JSMIN and Packer do not modify the source
> re-applying whitespace, indendation, etc), while yui-compressor and
> Google's do modify the source to remove dead branches, optimize, etc
The ELF binaries also depend on compiler versions, options and phase
of the moon, so the analogy isn't that wrong.
> My proposal:
> have multiple versions of binary libraries with soversions, different
> package names (libfoo1, libfoo2, etc). We would have libjs-jquery1.4,
> libjs-jquery1.6, etc
> then we do not have a problem. This never happens, AFAIK.
Not quite true; FusionForge upstream in particular ships some complete
versions of some jQuery plugins (FusionForge as a Debian package takes
care to use the system libraries). But that's a minor point :-)
> it. This is what I do in witty, for instance.
libraries in other languages", and I'm all in favour of that.
The best definition of an immortal is someone who hasn't died yet.
-- in Ye Gods! (Tom Holt)