Re: Re: / vs. /usr vs. fsck(8)
Stephan Seitz wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 09:24:33PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> I still do not believe that portability is an issue, and please
>> remember that this would not force people to use an initramfs unless
>> they want to keep /usr on a standalone file system.
>
> Most of my systems don’t use initramfs and have / and /usr on
> different file systems. I am no interested in changing this good
> tradition.
Other than tradition, for what reason do you put /usr on a different
filesystem?
- Josh Triplett
Reply to: