Re: RFC: Making mail-transport-agent Priority: optional
Josh Triplett <email@example.com> writes:
> What would it take to make this change?
Changing the LSB. Or you need to keep the sendmail interface. Which is
what mail-transport-agent provides.
> Have I missed any important points?
You forgot to explain the upside, reason, why, gain, whatever.
> Would any other packages need changes, other than the ones I've
> mentioned above?
all packages with cron jobs, all 3rd party applications assuming an UNIX
The reasons are all explained in the release notes.
Why not remove syslog as well? I'm pretty sure there are plenty of end
users never ever looking at a log file.