[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Move all to /usr

>>>>> Philipp Kern <trash@philkern.de> writes:
>>>>> On 2011-10-11, Ognyan Kulev <ogi@tower.3.bg> wrote:
>>>>> На 11.10.2011 17:32, Marco d'Itri написа:


 >> /usr/src -> /usr/share/src

 > Probably depends if you want to support compile outputs there.  I
 > guess some people compile their kernels there.

	Which isn't a good practice, anyway.  For the kernel, it was my
	preference to have a single source hierarchy, and a separate
	hierarchy for each build, under, e. g., /var/tmp/, or /home/.
	(I haven't build a kernel for a while, though.)

	With /usr mounted read-only, it's still a suitable place for
	sources, but hardly so for builds.

 >> /usr/local -> /local

 > Don't know what you want to say with that, apart from getting rid of
 > FHS.

	I did it this way, and I did it the other.  I feel no

	As for the shared /usr, having local/ under /usr allows for
	site-specific software to be seen by the NFS clients, which is
	probably what one would want.

FSF associate member #7257

Reply to: