Re: Introducing Build-Recommends / Build-Core-Depends?
Kyle Willmon writes ("Re: Introducing Build-Recommends / Build-Core-Depends?"):
> So, if you think it's ok to leave out the words "Depends" and
> "Recommends", the logical idea would be to use "Build-Stage1" (though I
> do not think this is the correct route. I, personally, am in favor of
Sorry to join the bikeshed discussion, but: AIUI there are packages
which need three build stages to bootstrap. So the field name ought
to have a number "1" so that those packages can have "2".