Re: Maintainers, porters, and burden of porting
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 07:34:41PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > - Being able to judge whether the maintainers have done their part in
> > reaching out to porters is a requisite for the above. And to do so, we
> > really need more visibility of those exchanges. According to devref
> > , the contact points we currently recommend are both the
> > debian-$arch mailing lists and the $email@example.com addresses.
> > Is there any reason why the latter are not public?
> Yes. Because one of the most frequent users is the security team
> asking where this and that security build is. We don't want that
> public for obvious reasons.
We changed this some time ago and made $arch readable by anybody,
the mbox's are at:
We've ask the security team to use firstname.lastname@example.org
instead, which is not public available.
And there is also email@example.com.