On 11-09-05 at 03:34pm, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > The current version of DEP-5 encourages people to use versioned url > for the Format: Field, as far as I can see from the description of > this field, and the way the examples. > > However, using the proposed expression in the description of the Format: > field (line 137 of rev 174): > http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/dep/web/deps/dep5.mdwn?op=file&rev=REVISION > yields an 400 error, because svn.debian.org/wsvn is being rewritten to > http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc, and the op=file operand is not valid > for viewvc. > > This is a minor issue,but I would propose to change it to > http://svn.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5.mdwn?revision=REVISION > if the Format field should point to a specific svn version of the > document. However, as far as I understand from [1,2], one might expect a > more readable and stable url as soon as #609160 is fixed. > > In the mean time, would you recommend to use > http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ > as a valid Format: url? I would recommend in the meantime to use a versioned URL of your choosing. As I believe is documented - the specific URL should be only an example. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature