[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: combined dependencies?

Hi again,

> B _does_ depend on C(A), if A is installed.

So B depends on

 ( A & C(A) ) | something-else

> > ... time passes ...
> > 
> > magic install C(A) ???
> > 
> > 
> > Isn't all you want a hard dependency of dkms on both the Linux kernel and its header package? It seems that right now this is just a Recommends. Could you maybe elaborate why a proper Depends: is not appropriate in your opinion?
> > 
> Its not any header package: dkms needs the _appropriate_ header
> package matching the installed kernel package. If
> linux-image-2.6.39-1-amd64 is installed, then dkms needs
> linux-headers-2.6.39-1-amd64.  If linux-image-3.0-1-amd64 is
> installed in parallel, then dkms needs linux-headers-3.0-1-amd64,
> too.
> Its just an example, anyway.

Isn't all you want (with l-i-1 = linux-image-2.6.39-1-amd64, l-h-2 =
linux-headers-3.0-1-amd64, etc.)

Depends: (l-i-1, l-h-1) | (l-i-2, l-h-2) | ...

And yes, that's not allowed. You need to convert that to CNF. Doable, but
results in a blow-up of the expression size. Hence what you want is

Depends: dkms-l-1 | dkms-l-2

with additional (almost empty) packages dkms-l-1 for 2.6.39 and dkms-l-2 for
3.0.1, where

Package: dkms-l-1
Depends: l-i-1, l-h-1

Package: dkms-l-2
Depends: l-i-2, l-h-2


Attachment: pgpu7jiHh6V8m.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: