[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#637892: ITP: python-formalchemy -- auto-generation and customizable form

Sorry to bother you, but my merge has failed, and I don't know why.
I retitled this
bug(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=526936 ) and make
myself as owner, but merge 526936 637892 has failed.
According this article(http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#merge
), bugs which I try to merge has same state, all not marked as
forwarded, all of the same severity. But does it has assigned?
And, I almost finish my job. But which bugnumber should I fill into
changelog? The new one or both?
Thanks for help.

2011/8/17 Arnaud Fontaine <arnau@debian.org>:
> Hi,
>>   By the way, this package seems in requested packages list. here is the
>> bug. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=526936
>>   As a new maintainer, I'm not so  sure what need to do next, any help
>> will be appreciated.
> As there was already a RFP, you should have not opened a new bug[0], but
> rather retitled the  RFP to ITP and assigned you as  owner by sending an
> email to BTS control bot[1].
> But, considering  that you  have already opened  it, you can  merge both
> bugs[2] and that will do.
> Hope that helps.
> Regards,
> --
> Arnaud Fontaine
> [0] http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
> [1] http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control
> [2] http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#merge

blog: http://shell909090.com/blog/
twitter: http://twitter.com/shell909090

Reply to: