Re: [kfreebsd] massive report for uninstallable FUSE packages
2011/7/16 YunQiang Su <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> Is it the job for fuse4bsd maintainers to set Provide: fuse-utils ?
fuse4bsd shouldn't provide fuse-utils because it's not completely
equivalent to this package. There are two important differences:
- A package may require fuse-utils because it relies specifically on
the semantics of fusermount.
- A package may have a versioned dependency, in which case an
alternate dependency is still needed.