Re: Short question how to avoid creating one of two binary packages from source

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Short question how to avoid creating one of two binary packages from source
From: Philipp Kern <trash@philkern.de>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 13:32:27 +0000 (UTC)
Message-id: <[🔎] slrniv477b.vv2.trash@kelgar.0x539.de>
Reply-to: phil@philkern.de
References: <[🔎] 1307660729.3782.12.camel@hp.my.own.domain> <[🔎] 87d3imlz6b.fsf@frosties.localnet> <[🔎] 1307708053.22466.181.camel@s1499.it.kth.se>

On 2011-06-10, Svante Signell <svante.signell@telia.com> wrote:
> Thank you for your reply. Is it possible to use the negative form too in
> the debian/control file?
>
> Package: ntp
> Architecture: !hurd-any (instead of any)
> Depends: ...

No, but "linux-any kfreebsd-any" might work.

Kind regards
Philipp Kern

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Short question how to avoid creating one of two binary packages from source
  - From: Simon Paillard <spaillard@debian.org>

References:
- Short question how to avoid creating one of two binary packages from source
  - From: Svante Signell <svante.signell@telia.com>
- Re: Short question how to avoid creating one of two binary packages from source
  - From: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>
- Re: Short question how to avoid creating one of two binary packages from source
  - From: Svante Signell <svante.signell@telia.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Urgent for Neil Williams
Next by Date: Re: Short question how to avoid creating one of two binary packages from source
Previous by thread: Re: Short question how to avoid creating one of two binary packages from source
Next by thread: Re: Short question how to avoid creating one of two binary packages from source
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread