[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Rolling release prototype

On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 10:31 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi Josselin,
> On Sun, 05 Jun 2011, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Don’t rush! Currently the rolling archive is empty. The first task is to
> > fill it. Therefore I’m now looking for people who are running testing on
> > their machines. The idea is to find which major bugs and usability
> > issues happen in testing, and to prove that the rolling concept
> > effectively makes the machines usable without a need for manual
> > intervention. Another good start is probably the list of RC bugs that
> > are fixed in unstable but not in testing.
> http://udd.debian.org/bugs.cgi?release=wheezy_not_sid&merged=ign&done=only&fnewerval=7&rc=1&sortby=popcon&sorto=desc
> Some interesting candidates could be:
> - fuse: security issues fixed in unstable
> - digikam: fix a crasher (might be blocked by dependencies)
> - libvirt: security issues fixed in unstable

linux-2.6 (plus linux-kbuild-2.6, linux-latest-2.6):
security issues fixed in unstable: CVE-2011-1748, CVE-2011-1759,
CVE-2011-1581, CVE-2011-1770, CVE-2011-1776, CVE-2011-1927


Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: