Re: Ok to use upstream doumentation as-is (i.e. not regenerate)?
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 14:10 +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> (Provided that said action does not cause unwanted side effects, like
> the documentation being out of date, because upstream forgot to
> regenerate them before distribution - but that falls under the "upstream
> to not be a moron" above ;)
I see this was some sort of joke, but did you have to call a volunteer
that made a mistake a moron? Did you have to repeat that negative label