Re: bug reporting workflow is outdated

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: bug reporting workflow is outdated
From: Patrick Strasser <patrick.strasser@tugraz.at>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 18:21:44 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] irgluo$d29$2@dough.gmane.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] slrnitnjur.p7v.nospam@sshway.ssh.pusling.com>
References: <[🔎] BANLkTi=FGSbvxG7adBThc_3L+moU0KmhfA@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] ire3if$54t$1@dough.gmane.org> <[🔎] 19931.38864.379579.84538@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <[🔎] irgheu$d1a$1@dough.gmane.org> <[🔎] slrnitnjur.p7v.nospam@sshway.ssh.pusling.com>

schrieb Sune Vuorela am 2011-05-24 17:33:
> On 2011-05-24, Patrick Strasser <patrick.strasser@tugraz.at> wrote:
>> Pros and cons for reportbug HTTP transport:
> 
> Heh. your pro's is all about the user.
> the con is all about the developer.

1) reportbug is about to enable users to help developers solve problems.
2) To quote myselv:
> That is only the case for third-party
> reporting tools, not reportbug HTTP transport.

Patrick
-- 
Engineers motto: cheap, good, fast: choose any two
Patrick Strasser <patrick dot strasser at student dot tugraz dot at>
Student of Telemati_cs_, Techn. University Graz, Austria

Reply to:

References:
- bug reporting workflow is outdated
  - From: Pedro Larroy <pedro.larroy@gmail.com>
- Re: bug reporting workflow is outdated
  - From: Patrick Strasser <patrick.strasser@tugraz.at>
- Re: bug reporting workflow is outdated
  - From: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: bug reporting workflow is outdated
  - From: Patrick Strasser <patrick.strasser@tugraz.at>
- Re: bug reporting workflow is outdated
  - From: Sune Vuorela <nospam@vuorela.dk>

Prev by Date: Re: double checking Debian's 686-pae vs. -486 probe
Next by Date: Re: double checking Debian's 686-pae vs. -486 probe
Previous by thread: Re: bug reporting workflow is outdated
Next by thread: Re: bug reporting workflow is outdated
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread