Re: Bits from the Release Team - Kicking off Wheezy
On 28/04/11 at 13:10 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 28/04/2011 12:03, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Might be, except that I don't want to keep the name "testing" due
> > to its connotation that doesn't reflect well the goal of something
> > that's constantly usable.
> Except that it's lying to our users to name it "rolling" because packages
> from rolling won't be rc-bug free. For this reason, I think that "testing"
> is a very well choosen name, more honest about its state. If people think
> that "testing" (as a suite) is broken, then we should try to change that
> idea, instead of just changing its name. (IMO)
Unless we say that rolling will be RC-bug free, I don't see why it's
lying to our users.
But your point is correct: we need to define clearly what we provide
to our users with rolling.