[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: /run support for wheezy?

Am 03.04.2011 13:10, schrieb Goswin von Brederlow:
> Roger Leigh <rleigh@codelibre.net> writes:
>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:20:45PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> 1) /etc/init.d/mountall.sh is broken for some reason.  The "mount -a"
>>    invocation fails.  Not because it fails to mount, but it returns a
>>    32 exit status because / and /proc are already mounted.
>>    Possibly a result of the mtab.sh domtab() changes; but it should be
>>    behaving identically to the old version, so possibly unrelated.
>>    Possibly already broken and I've just exposed a bug?
> If it is what I think it is then I have already filed this bug.
> The problem arises because the initramfs mount for proc differs from the
> one listed in /etc/fstab. The mount then decides that something else is
> mounted on /proc and gives an error. The problem is that initramfs uses
> "none" as device while mountkernfs / fstab use "proc".

Is there a good reason why /proc is in /etc/fstab but all other API fs are
mounted by initscripts directly?
I'd prefer if we removed /proc from fstab by default (on new installations)

Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to: