Re: Cross compiler ITP (armel)
On Wed, 23, Mar, 2011 at 08:15:52AM +0900, Charles Plessy spoke thus..
> Le Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:54:47AM +0000, Mark Hymers a écrit :
> > I'm not entirely sure where this should be documented, it's not really a
> > policy thing as it's specific to the archive. Suggestions welcome.
> Since the binary package control files is documented in the Policy, that will
> also document the archive-related DM-Upload-Allowed field in its next version
> (see #588014), I think that it would be nice to have the Built-Using field
> documented there too. I find it inconvenient to have the syntax of a file
> scattered accross documents. I can write a patch for the Policy according to
> the minutes you will publish later.
Well, assuming that the policy team agree that it should go there, I'm
happy to review any wording you come up with. To be honest, the details
are already in my recent posts to -devel although we'll also pull them
together in the minutes to d-d-a later on.
Mark Hymers <mhy at debian dot org>
"I've had people claim that they actually make the sun rise rise every
morning. I've offered to test them by shooting them. So far all these
people have not responded to my endeavours."
James Randi on BBCi Live Chat