Hi, Am Montag, den 28.02.2011, 19:12 +0000 schrieb Roger Leigh: > Agreed. Note that we now support strict 'first-only' alternatives > handling with the 'apt' and 'aptitude' resolvers. See the notes for > 0.60.0 and 0.60.1 pertaining to resolvers here: > > http://git.debian.org/?p=buildd-tools/sbuild.git;a=blob;f=NEWS;h=f4576f0e3b3c0fcd660000abcd93898697246b9a;hb=HEAD > > We have made the alternative resolving configurable, so that you can > use strict 'first only' or all alternatives. It defaults to > 'first only', which will give resolution almost entirely like the > internal resolver. I have a bit a bad feeling about not being able to use alternatives in build-depends. For example at the moment, we are renaming a self-hosting compiler package from ghc6 to ghc. Previously, the dependency has been on "ghc6". Now it is "ghc | ghc6", at least for the transition period, and it would be a shame if the buildds would (do?) not cope with that. And before someone suggests to have one upload with a dependency on ghc6 and then the next on ghc only – this would be troublesome as the compiler will not work immediately on all arches, and we really like to improving the package with subsequent uploads while sorting out how to get it to compile on problematic architectures. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part