Re: [buildd-tools-devel] re buildd's resolver and package's build deps
Julien Cristau <email@example.com> writes:
> I'm still not sure how 'Build-Depends: foo [i386] | bar [amd64]'
> would make sense (as opposed to making it an 'and').
They're equivalent, so I would view it as intended for human readers, not
In other words, I see a Build-Depends of:
foo [i386] | bar [amd64]
as saying "there's some part of the build that uses foo on i386, bar on
amd64, and handles it internal to the package on other architectures,"
whereas a Build-Depends of:
foo [i386], bar [amd64]
I'd read as "there's a feature enabled on i386 that requires foo, and a
separate feature enabled on amd64 that requires bar."
In the end, it both reduces to the same thing, but it helps human readers
figure out how the dependencies are related.
Russ Allbery (firstname.lastname@example.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>