[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Safe File Update (atomic)

On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh >> Maybe I
wasn't clear, in that case I'm sorry. To me, O_ATOMIC is
> Whether this should map to O_ATOMIC in glibc or be something new, I don't
> care.  But if it is a flag, I'd highly suggest naming it O_CREATEUNLINKED or
> something else that won't give people wrong ideas, as _nothing_ but the
> final inode linking is atomic.

How does this solve the meta-data issue?


Reply to: