RE: suggestion about debian devel extension
Dear Asheesh.
It is very glad to disscuss with you.
> That looks pretty cool! What do you mean by "put it under debian"?
I want to host the website under debian. Because the number of packages in debian is huge, it is beyond my capibility to build a website with 1/1000 packages in debian. It comes from debian , so it should go under debian. This means debian has the full control of the website, even dismissing.
> How do you find your system compares to OpenGrok? It'd be good to know
> about advantages of yours.
OpenGrok is the front end of Exuberant Ctags .
For the advantages of mine:
1. Process condition pre compile directive, the uncompiled parts
will be gray.
It is very useful for multi-system packages. Normally the code for linux, win. freebsd and so on is mess together. Such code will be annoying for the coder for particular architecture.
2 File included by #include will be identified.
100% garantee is declaimed for #include directive. The wrong result with same-name file is impossible.
3. The cross reference is accurate.
For example :
Use ctags, you get :
Searched defs:sigcontext (Results 1 -
4 of 4) sorted by null
/ext3/ext2-gate/usr/src/cmd/csh/i386/signal.h 45 struct sigcontext { struct
/ext3/ext2-gate/usr/src/cmd/csh/sparc/signal.h 44 struct sigcontext { struct
/ext3/ext2-gate/usr/src/lib/libbc/inc/include/sys/signal.h 160 struct sigcontext { struct
/ext3/ext2-gate/usr/src/ucbhead/sys/signal.h 290 struct sigcontext { struct
349 void (*sv_handler)(int, int, struct sigcontext *, char *);
For mine, only one result will returned. even multi results are returned, they link to the same positiion of the same file.
best wishes,
milkway_3
----------------------------------------
> Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 00:25:34 -0400
> From: asheesh@asheesh.org
> To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: suggestion about debian devel extension
>
> On Wed, 7 Jul 2010, milkway_3@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>> As a programmer under debian, I really appriciate the rich debian
>> packages.
>>
>> However, it is not convenient to read and analysis source code, even
>> with emacs and scsope.
>>
>> A litte progress has been acheived after fighting for years. You can
>> test it at http://jp.hostesr.com/.
>>
>> For benefit of all developers, it is best to put it under debian.
>
> That looks pretty cool! What do you mean by "put it under debian"?
>
> Also, have you seen OpenGrok? There was effort to put a code index online
> using that -- see
> http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-devel@lists.debian.org/msg281864.html
> for a little more discussion of that. It's a pretty intense, effective
> code indexer. You can see it live on the OpenSolaris codebase, e.g.
> http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/ext3/ext2-gate/usr/src/ucblib/libucb/sparc/sys/signal.c
> -- check out how "signal.h" links to the signal.h file that gets used.
>
> How do you find your system compares to OpenGrok? It'd be good to know
> about advantages of yours.
>
> It's good to see that you're interested in making code easier to browse
> through! That is a real need.
>
> -- Asheesh.
>
> --
> A kind of Batman of contemporary letters.
> -- Philip Larkin on Anthony Burgess
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] alpine.DEB.2.00.1007070013130.8808@rose.makesad.us">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] alpine.DEB.2.00.1007070013130.8808@rose.makesad.us
>
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2
Reply to: