Re: Bug#579796: ITP: othman -- electronic Quran browser in Python
أحمد المحمودي dijo [Sat, May 01, 2010 at 12:48:47PM +0300]:
> On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 11:27:27AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > "Harm others" is a vague term that can be applied to a wide range of
> > activities usually considered ok[1].
>
> I am indeed discussing this matter with upstream. That license terms
> need to be clear not vague.
Without getting deeper in the licensing of Othman itself, would you
consider the text of the Coran itself to be DFSG-free? I _think_ that
any religious text can only be distributed verbatim, not modified in
any way - That is completely legitimate, as it has been debated over
and over regarding the IETF RFCs.
--
Gunnar Wolf • gwolf@gwolf.org • (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244
Reply to: