Re: openresolv vs. resolvconf
On 30 November 2010 22:57, Thomas Hood <jdthood@gmail.com> wrote:
> An important advantage of openresolv could be that it isn't, like resolvconf, undermaintained[1]. If openresolv is truly a drop-in replacement for resolvconf then migration from resolvconf to openresolv would be one way of solving this undermaintenance problem.
Do we really need two solutions for what appears to be the same
problem? Seems like it might be better to merge them or remove one.
Especially if one is under-maintained. This is one case I don't see
any advantage having two independent implementations.
--
Brian May <brian@microcomaustralia.com.au>
Reply to: