[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#605009: serious performance regression with ext4



On 29.11.2010 07:18, Guillem Jover wrote:

> 
> Could someone with ext4/btrfs/xfs/etc test w/ and w/o the attached patch
> against dpkg?

I'm using ext4 (as already mentioned), my small benchmark is (re)installing
vim-runtime using dpkg -i

1.15.8.5:
real    0m9.259s
user    0m4.212s
sys     0m0.752s

1.15.8.6:
real    0m41.766s
user    0m4.248s
sys     0m1.028s

1.15.8.6 (force-unsafe-io):
real    0m8.404s
user    0m4.244s
sys     0m0.752s

1.15.8.6 (+patch posix_fadvise):
real    0m7.635s
user    0m4.272s
sys     0m0.840s



HTH,
Michael


-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: