Re: Bug#605009: serious performance regression with ext4
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 11:52:07AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 16:09:10 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > How about dpkg doesn't care, like it used to, *except* for really
> > important packages (say, essential ones, or priority important, or
> > whatever). Since apparently the whole avoid empty files thing is much
> > more important for libc than it is for iceweasel, when for one your
> > system is hosed and for the other, you have everything required to
> > repair. We could even provide an autorepair tool that could e.g. use
> > debsums to check installed files and reinstall hosed packages.
>
> I already discarded this option in
> <https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15910>. This does not
> include important things such as boot loaders, kernel images, or other
> things needed for booting.
... all of which could be tagged in some way.
Mike
Reply to: