[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: unstable/testing/[pending/frozen/]stable

On 22/09/2010 15:01, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I think that if you concentrate on preparing the next release like you
>  do, volunteers that are not interested in the stable release (except 
> for their own package) will show up and deal with migrations to 
> rolling.

It won't happen but I'd be happy to be proven wrong though.

> It's always the same story, you can't force people to care about
> stable simply by not having a "play-forever-suite".

We are not trying to force people, but rather trying to give them a bit of
responsibility during the release process. « Releasing is a shared
responsibility, not only release team's »…

> And we do have people working on derivative distributions that rely on 
> testing's constant freshness, maybe some of them would be interested
> to help as well.

Nice plan! Please let me know what it happens.

> Anyway, I'd like to ask you all to hold off the discussion for a few 
> hours until everybody can read the summary of the CUT discussions and 
> have a clearer ideas of the proposals and the implications.


> Cheers,

Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي

Reply to: