Re: unstable/testing/[pending/frozen/]stable
On 22/09/2010 15:01, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> I think that if you concentrate on preparing the next release like you
> do, volunteers that are not interested in the stable release (except
> for their own package) will show up and deal with migrations to
> rolling.
>
It won't happen but I'd be happy to be proven wrong though.
> It's always the same story, you can't force people to care about
> stable simply by not having a "play-forever-suite".
We are not trying to force people, but rather trying to give them a bit of
responsibility during the release process. « Releasing is a shared
responsibility, not only release team's »…
> And we do have people working on derivative distributions that rely on
> testing's constant freshness, maybe some of them would be interested
> to help as well.
>
Nice plan! Please let me know what it happens.
>
> Anyway, I'd like to ask you all to hold off the discussion for a few
> hours until everybody can read the summary of the CUT discussions and
> have a clearer ideas of the proposals and the implications.
>
Ack.
> Cheers,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
Reply to: