Re: Bug#597571: nodejs: non common executable name
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 03:54:41PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Wrong. nodejs still provides the binary nodejs and not _node_. So, nodejs can
> stay as is. The rename would be necessary if both packages provide the
> same binary (same filename), which is not the case here.
Actually, from the discussion in debian-hams, nodejs provides a binary
named "node" - otherwise we would not need to have the discussion at all
since there would be no conflict.
Patrick Ouellette firstname.lastname@example.org
ne4po (at) arrl (dot) net Amateur Radio: NE4PO
What kind of change have you been in the world today?