On Tuesday 31 August 2010 22:39:18 Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > * Arrange for database servers to start before Apache I wouldn't like that. We would be removing possible parallelism (in a far far away future when we would be using this) at boot. > * Arrange for RT to be more robust when a connection to the database fails That sounds better. Sounds to me that we assume the SQL server used is going to be on localhost. It's quite a strong assumption and a connection can always fail, so the application shouldn't crash. The original email was talking about a manual restart of apache. I didn't try it myself but... does the apache server terminates because of a failed connection to a database from a web application running on apache itself? _If_ this is the case, this behavior is absolutely wrong and should be considered a bug without trying to look for workarounds. Bye -- Salvo Tomaselli
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.